Officialsportsbetting.com Golf Betting Tiger Woods talks equipment testing

Tiger Woods talks equipment testing

A year ago, Tiger Woods signed an endorsement deal with TaylorMade after spending the majority of his professional career using Nike equipment. In the ensuing 12 months, Woods was mostly sidelined due to continued back issues and rehab, but an encouraging performance at last month’s Hero World Challenge has golf fans fired up for his return to the PGA TOUR at this week’s Farmers Insurance Open. PGATOUR.COM Equipment Insider Jonathan Wall recently had an extended one-on-one interview with Woods during a TaylorMade testing session near Woods’ home in Jupiter, Florida. The conversation ranged from his testing process to his evolution in equipment to his club specs to his unique response when asked about golf without a governing body. Testing process On how his testing process changed since 1996 when he turned pro: TIGER WOODS: “When I first turned pro, it was hosel, no adjustable weights. It was just glued hosels and go ahead and hit it. It was a different era, it was a different time, but now TrackMan allows us to cut down on our testing, cut down on our practice sessions, and we’re not beating ourselves into the ground that way. For me, it validated feel, and so when I would feel something and then look at the numbers, it would validate it. Sometimes engineers may not always believe what I’m feeling or what a player is feeling and saying, but then the numbers can definitely validate it.â€�  On his preparation for a club testing: WOODS: “I always test. I’ve never had a problem testing. I’ve always tested, though, when I’m actually hitting well. I don’t want to test when I’m hitting poorly because then I think you can find a club that’s going to Band‑Aid it, and you really don’t know what truly is going to happen when your game turns around.  And so I would push off testings until I worked on my game. Generally I’d do two or three days of practice sessions prior to a testing.â€�  On determining whether to make a club switch:  WOODS: “First of all, it has to be better than what I’m playing, and the only way … is not only to hit it on the range and to see good results, but I’ve got to go out on the golf course and hit shot after shot after shot. Specific shots — bunker here, you have water here, you have wind blowing here, and you’ve got to hit this shot, and just do it day after day after day after day. There’s no magic one day of ‘Oh, this club is in.’ It’s OK, that’s good hitting it that way, [but] let’s try and do something different, different wind conditions, let’s see what happens. “One of the things I think I’ve really done over the years is that I’ve been pretty ardent about playing a product that is better than what I’m using, and all of the companies I’ve been with, they all know that. I will give it my best efforts to try and put it in, but it’s going to take a little time sometimes.â€� On taking the testing process from the range to the course: WOODS: “First things first, it has to look good in the playing position. If it doesn’t look good, I’m already looking at stuff I don’t want to look at, and how am I supposed to hit the most beautiful golf shot with something I don’t like? OK, that’s out. The next one is how does it feel when I waggle it? My hands are the only thing that are touching the golf club, and I’ve been trained to trust my hands, and so as I waggle it — ooh, that feels good, or ooh, that’s a little toe-heavy, or ooh, that weight is way far back. So I get a sense of that, and then hit shots, normally just throw out a couple and then you fire a couple and then you kind of tweak them a little bit.  And then either that day or the next day, I’ll go out and hit some balls on the golf course.â€� On using the waggle as his starting point: WOODS: “I’ve always done that. My dad was a big believer of trusting your hands, let the hands guide you in the golf swing. So that’s what I’ve always done. For as long as I can remember, I’ve always waggled the club and tried to get a feel for it.â€� “Quite frankly it’s easier now to feel it because don’t forget we had these little bitty club heads [early in his career]. The golf ball and the head were like the same size. Well, there’s not a lot of weight distribution that’s left in there. Now they’re [460cc driver heads]. So it’s easier to feel when it’s off a little bit or a little bit different. I’ve always tried to have a baseline, so the baseline is the club that I have in the golf bag because I know they work. Now, I work off of that baseline.” On how much input he gives TrackMan numbers: WOODS: “I’m probably 80/20. Eighty percent feel and hitting shots and 20 percent TrackMan. Yeah, it’s nice to see numbers. I like to do it for swing path a lot of times. I like to see what my path is doing but also when I get up to the longer stuff, I like to see what my spin rate is, and so that’s something where for me that’s what I focus on. I know a lot of guys focus on numbers, how far are they hitting it. I’ve already got my clubs pretty dialed into numbers, how far I’m hitting it. I’ve got a whole golf course in the backyard (laughs). So my wedge game is pretty much dialed in in that way. TrackMan is for hitting specific numbers on wedge shots, which a lot of guys use that for. I have that in my backyard.”  On getting his driver dialed in: WOODS: “It doesn’t need to be bang‑on because I’m not going to hit every shot perfect. But once it’s in the ballpark — what I like is I will actually try and mis‑hit a couple shots and see what it does, what my tendencies are, especially under the gun. I like to hit these little low bleeding fades out there, and my miss has always been off the heel, so what does it look like when I hit it off the heel a little bit?â€� On matching up new clubs with a new ball: WOODS: “The golf ball was the first and foremost. That’s where I started from. I started from the green back. … Most of the golf balls are very hard. I like to have a softer golf ball, a little bit more spin. Once I found that, that part of it was nice. Now, as far as working my way through the bag, I had a hard time with that because at the time I was still hurt, and so my testing was very limited in that regard, which was frustrating. My irons didn’t change, so the only thing that changed were my woods, and my speed had come down dramatically, and so we were looking at more loft, a little more help in the shaft at the bottom, a little more kick, all these things I found very frustrating, but it was very real at the same time.â€� On the importance of sound and feel with irons: WOODS: “Oh, the feel, absolutely. It’s got to perform through the turf. That’s the feedback. That’s what goes into my hands and the forearms and I get a good sense of what’s going on. I’ve always been a person that couldn’t stand some of the new technology in irons because if I hit one flush, it should go on the absolute number, that’s it. Can’t go any further. Sometimes you may catch a jumper now with these new irons, a little bit hotter faces, they’ll jump if you hit it flush. For me, the worst thing I could possibly happen is if I mis‑hit it [and] then it goes the proper distance. I’m like, Uh‑oh, did I hit that bad? I want it to go short because where’s all the trouble. You can’t get up‑and‑down from long. You can always get up‑and‑down from short. So I’d much rather hit a bad shot and be, whatever, come up five yards short generally. That’s OK. I don’t want to have any surprises long.â€�  Club thoughts On his initial thoughts of TaylorMade’s M3 and M4 lines: WOODS: “When they first introduced the Twist Face and what that looks like, obviously the beginning model, it was like this is crazy. It looks like a [Ruffles] potato chip, you know? It looked awful. But in the playing position, you don’t even see it, it’s so subtle. Obviously, the mockup that they gave me is just to exemplify what they’re actually doing. But in the playing position, you don’t even notice it. I would try and hit a couple shots off the heel because that’s where I always miss it. I miss everything on the heel, and I grew up in an era where it was Balata balls and persimmon. I was probably the last kind of generation that probably grew up with that. So I was always taught to hit the ball on the heel as your miss, stay in the air and hit a cut and get it in play. Total quick hook with persimmon was awful.  Because of that, I’ve always missed it on the heel. “I like the Twist Face because I’m hitting that spot, that shot with a little bit more oomph to it. It doesn’t quite bleed out like it used to do. So that to me is already promising, but I’ve still got to do a lot of testing on the range and then obviously bring it to the golf course and put a lot of work in on it.â€� On providing design feedback such as on TaylorMade’s prototype 6-iron: WOODS: “I am very simple when it comes to my blades. I like them a certain length. I’ve played blades basically since I was 16 years old, and so I’ve traditionally liked a longer-size blade. Not the Hogan PCs or Apex, which are basically the little bitty ones. Mine are a little bit longer. You know, I remember playing old Daiwa Advisors that Ian Baker‑Finch used to play, David Graham played, and so I liked that little longer head. And I like the top line a little bit on the thinner side. But as I told these guys, I said, hey, you can put a dancing monkey on the back of a club, I don’t care. I don’t care what it’s stamped like. Just so it looks good in playing the position, which I like. This one looked great, and it’s in the window that I’m looking for.â€� On his transition to adjustable hosels: WOODS: “I found it frustrating at the beginning, but also I’ve found it pretty awesome in the sense that because I was hurt at the time trying to do all these testings, I couldn’t afford to hit a bunch of different clubs, and so I decided to tweak with this head, the shaft, this weight on more heel bias, more toe bias, just trying to figure it all out. It became a lot easier on my body, so that part was nice. And then because of that, I gravitated towards that, and that made me think that, you know what, hey, I’ve got to learn all this stuff. There’s like over a thousand different settings. OK, so I’ve got to go to school, so teach me what is all this stuff, and teach me the physics, teach me the geometry. Once I started to understand what was going on, I could assert myself more in a conversation about what I needed from a club, and I think that really helped me be able to put together my set, and one of the reasons why I drove it so well [at the Hero World Challenge], why I hit the 3‑wood so well and why the 2‑iron is really working because I finally understood it.â€�  On his club specs: WOODS: “I’m stock spec from say the 60s. The only thing that would be weird is I have a 60‑degree sand wedge. I didn’t have a 60 until probably late high school, just 56 and open and whatever you want to do. I had a 1‑iron and a 2‑iron. But yeah, my pitching wedge is 50 degrees, my 9‑iron is 45 and a half. I see some of these guys with pitching wedges that are 45 or 44. This whole four‑wedge system I don’t understand; just why don’t you take something off? I just don’t understand that part. In the Bahamas I had 89 yards out and 95 yards out and pulled out pitching wedge. To me that’s what I’ve been able to do. Let’s also don’t forget I play a softer, spinnier ball, so those little shots are easier for me to hit.â€� On shaft-length and spec changes from Nike to TaylorMade: WOODS: “I went from 45 [inches], sometimes 44-3/4ths down to 44-1/2. I picked up more distance when I went down to that length. Because I’m still accustomed to playing a 43-1/2 for so many years, and when I went to 45, I’d just lose it in space. When I went down to 44-1/2, I felt great. 44-1/4, I feel it even better, but the problem is I lose too much distance in it. I don’t have enough oomph, so I settled on 44-1/2. “3‑wood is the same, stock. My loft of my 3‑wood is 15 degrees. I’ve generally played 14 and a half to 15 degrees in my 3‑wood since I was 20. All of my irons are — all my irons since I was 16 years old have been the same loft. Now, they’ve been different lies based on my coaches that I was using at the time, they’d go upright to flat or wherever they may be, but the lofts are all the same.â€�  On his grind preference with his wedges: WOODS: “My bounce generally has been towards the leading edge. I have a relief right next to the leading edge so I’m able to hit it on hard‑packed ground, able to get the leading edge down. But I also have enough relief on the back so I can slide it underneath on the heel side. But you know, traditionally my soles have been pretty much standard in width, a little more rounded than some guys, just because I like to use different parts of the bounce, depending on what shot I’m going to use. But it really hasn’t changed that much in like 15 years or so. It’s been pretty much the same.â€� Team TaylorMade On whether he considered become a free agent after Nike exited the equipment industry: WOODS: “I was going the free agent route. I did, and then looked at my house — it was a warehouse. A lot of manufacturers were sending me stuff. Tell me how this looks, tell me how that looks. Let me narrow it down here. And then I didn’t have to go anywhere, I could just test right here on my simulator, so I tested on my simulator, tried to see what it would feel like. Ooh, that felt not so good. That felt pretty good. TaylorMade’s were feeling consistently good across the board. So I thought, I’ve got to take this stuff outside and see what it does. And I did it, and I was just blown away how stable the club was and how far I was able to hit it.â€� On why he was drawn to TaylorMade: WOODS: “Don’t forget — I played TaylorMade in my amateur days and a little bit in my collegiate stuff, and on top of that, one of my best friends was Mark O’Meara. He was with TaylorMade forever. So I was always privy to all this new stuff from the Burner Plus to the Bubble shaft that came out, and he won two major championships that year in ’98. So I’ve been privy to a lot of the tech that was coming out with TaylorMade just because of being around with Mark. I knew the quality, but then again, I’ve won with Nike, I’ve put all my efforts into that business. It didn’t turn out, but now I’m here to be able to put all my efforts into TaylorMade.â€� On the importance of working with club builder Mike Taylor, who was also part of Tiger’s team at Nike: WOODS: “Mikey T is the best. He trained with [Ben] Hogan. He’d been through it. And he’s got such a unique ability to grind and have me tell him what I want and have him create it. Just our communication is just fantastic. “What I just said, it has to perform through the dirt. With his southern accent, man, he’s talking about, ‘Man, perform through the dirt.’ So him talking like that and his gyrations that he gets into — but he’s a master craftsman. He really is. He’s got a great feel and a great eye. Our rapport has been fantastic, but also I have a lot of trust in Mike. He’s been able to produce what I want, and since he’s been on board, I’ve had some pretty darned good years.â€� On getting feedback from other TaylorMade staff players: WOODS: “I do a lot with the TaylorMade guys now, whether it’s Rory [McIlroy], Jason [Day] or [Dustin Johnson], [Justin Rose]. It’s just because I’m so far behind the curve; I haven’t been with TaylorMade that long. And then while I’ve been with TaylorMade I’ve been hurt. And so I’m kind of out to date on a lot of information that they’ve been prevalent to, and also what they’ve been feeling in tournaments. Normally I can see what they’re doing in the tournaments, I can see the shots they hit and all that stuff. That gives me an idea of what’s going on. I haven’t just been watching TV. ‘It’s nice to talk with those guys, and especially why they put this in play, and like DJ, he’s got a 4 wood in there. I said, ‘How far do you hit that club? it’s like 17 degrees.’ He’s like, ‘Well, I hit it about 280, 285.’ He said, ‘Yeah, if I go down to 15 it goes too far, like 290, 300.’ I’m like, ‘Dude, stop. Enough. Enough. I’m not asking you anymore.’ (laughs)â€� On working with TaylorMade Tour rep Keith Sbarbaro: WOODS: “We haven’t worked together that many times. As I said, unfortunately, my health was a big deterrent in a lot of that stuff. But I’ve been on TOUR when I was playing, and he was working with DJ or playing practice rounds with him. Even caddied for DJ a couple times. Also he worked with Jason [Day], and Jason I pick his brains all the time on clubs and shots and all that stuff. And so I’ve known Keith for quite some time, and I’ve seen what he’s done for guys, and he’s incredible. He’s very talented, very good at what he does, and he’s honest. He’s not going to blow smoke up your butt. He’s very straightforward. He’s going to say, that club is not good for you, that club’s good for you. Or you didn’t hit that right. Yeah, I did. No, you didn’t, that kind of thing. He’s straightforward, and that’s what you want out of a person in your camp. You want someone to tell you just like it is, whether or not you agree.â€� Equipment rules On how equipment would be different without a governing body: WOODS: “Well, no governing body, I think that you would have to carry 14 drivers. What I mean by that is have somebody in the stands or gallery, whatever, come along with you, like a Keith [Sbarbaro], because you can have it as thin as possible, you can tee it as high as you possibly can, and you’re going to hit this thing, crack the face, but it’s going to knuckle and fly forever. Yeah, that’s what I would foresee that every player would be doing. Why not, if you can, because you can replace a club if you break it. In the motion of playing, not in anger but hitting off the tee. But yeah, hit it off the face and let’s go.â€� On his stance about the golf ball: WOODS: “I am of the opinion that we should bifurcate. The line of demarcation, in my opinion, should be professional and amateur. That’s it. If you play in a pro member, the pro has got to play this other ball, the pro ball. If you’re an amateur, you can play the most juiced up golf ball, just go hit and go find it. I think that amateur golf, we can actually push the limits with everything if not get rid of the limits, right. Let them go have fun. Let them enjoy it. Let them — we’re trying to bring more people into the game of golf. Let them go ahead and enjoy hitting it further and straighter. “But professional ranks, it’s like a different deal. It’s like going from aluminum in little league and college to when you turn pro and go into A, AA and AAA and obviously the bigs, it’s all wood. That’s just the way it is. The rules are bifurcated for them. There’s no reason why we can’t do it for us. Now, then that goes back to do you standardize the golf ball at the pro level, and this is where it’s kind of tricky because each manufacturer is going to say, no, you can’t, because they want to produce their own golf ball. But you can probably change dimple patterns to make them a little bit deeper, a little bit smaller. You can soften up the cover, obviously soften of the core, make it slower, and you can bring the ball back.â€�

Click here to read the full article

Do you want to gamble with Litecoin? Check this list of the best casinos to play with Litecoin!

2nd Round 3 Balls - A. Iwai / C. Canales / I. Lindblad
Type: 2nd Round 3 Balls - Status: OPEN
Akie Iwai-105
Ingrid Lindblad+140
Caroline Canales+500
2nd Round 3 Balls - H. Green / M. Sagstrom / N. Korda
Type: 2nd Round 3 Balls - Status: OPEN
Nelly Korda+105
Hannah Green+180
Madelene Sagstrom+300
2nd Round 3 Balls - L. Vu / S. Schmelzel / S.Y. Kim
Type: 2nd Round 3 Balls - Status: OPEN
Lilia Vu+150
Sei Young Kim+170
Sarah Schmelzel+210
Volvo China Open
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Eugenio Lopez-Chacarra+250
Haotong Li+250
Tapio Pulkkanen+500
Zecheng Dou+1600
Jannik De Bruyn+2200
Jordan Smith+2200
Yannik Paul+3000
Daniel Hillier+3500
Edoardo Molinari+3500
Sam Bairstow+3500
Click here for more...
3rd Round 2 Balls - J. Smith v S. Bairstow
Type: 3rd Round 2 Balls - Status: OPEN
Jordan Smith-110
Sam Bairstow+120
Tie+750
3rd Round 2 Balls - E. Molinari v K. Kobori
Type: 3rd Round 2 Balls - Status: OPEN
Kazuma Kobori+100
Edoardo Molinari+110
Tie+750
3rd Round 2 Balls - Y. Paul v Z. Dou
Type: 3rd Round 2 Balls - Status: OPEN
Zecheng Dou-105
Yannik Paul+115
Tie+750
3rd Round 2 Balls - J. De Bruyn v T. Pulkkanen
Type: 3rd Round 2 Balls - Status: OPEN
Tapio Pulkkanen-120
Jannik De Bruyn+130
Tie+750
3rd Round 2 Balls - H. Li v E. Lopez-Chacarra
Type: 3rd Round 2 Balls - Status: OPEN
Haotong Li-110
Eugenio Lopez-Chacarra+120
Tie+750
Major Specials 2025
Type: To Win A Major 2025 - Status: OPEN
Scottie Scheffler+160
Bryson DeChambeau+350
Xander Schauffele+350
Ludvig Aberg+400
Collin Morikawa+450
Jon Rahm+450
Brooks Koepka+700
Justin Thomas+700
Viktor Hovland+700
Hideki Matsuyama+800
Click here for more...
PGA Championship 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+500
Bryson DeChambeau+1400
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Xander Schauffele+1400
Jon Rahm+1800
Collin Morikawa+2000
Brooks Koepka+2500
Justin Thomas+2500
Viktor Hovland+2500
Click here for more...
US Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+500
Bryson DeChambeau+1200
Xander Schauffele+1200
Jon Rahm+1400
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Collin Morikawa+1600
Brooks Koepka+1800
Viktor Hovland+2000
Justin Thomas+2500
Click here for more...
The Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+550
Xander Schauffele+1100
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Collin Morikawa+1600
Jon Rahm+1600
Bryson DeChambeau+2000
Shane Lowry+2500
Tommy Fleetwood+2500
Tyrrell Hatton+2500
Click here for more...
Ryder Cup 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
USA-150
Europe+140
Tie+1200

Related Post

Fantasy golf: One & Done picks, Dell Technologies ChampionshipFantasy golf: One & Done picks, Dell Technologies Championship

The 20th of 24 contributing events for PGA TOUR Champions One & Done presented by SERVPRO is this week’s Shaw Charity Classic. It begins on Friday. Scroll for tournament notes, 16 notables and four wild cards from the field of 78 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Bryson DeChambeau is everything but a scrappy middle infielder just happy to be on the roster, but when he goes two months without doing any damage, sending him to the plate at THE NORTHERN TRUST and asking him to clear the wall was everything we want when we target swinging for the fences. However, his victory – by four strokes at that – also isn’t what we can expect. DeChambeau slotted 25th overall with an ownership percentage of just 0.90 at Ridgewood, so the apathy was evident. Gotta love golf and you gotta love the timing of the crack of the bat. With 2,000 FedExCup points rewarded to each of the four winners in the Playoffs, it’s so, so, sweet when one goes yard. A relatively unfamiliar track like Ridgewood figures to yield that outcome more than, say, TPC Boston. As stated in my Power Rankings on Monday, since the inaugural edition of the Dell Technologies Championship won by Adam Scott in 2003, only Phil Mickelson (2007) has prevailed in a first appearance. Despite your best arguments, that fact rules out the likes of percolating Tommy Fleetwood, Tyrrell Hatton, Alex Noren, Beau Hossler, Peter Uihlein and 13 others; that is, if all you’re chasing is the trophy. If that goal sounds obvious, then you’re new here. My objective in every tournament is a top 10. Top fives are bonuses and victories are worthy of celebration. Even some contenders late in the season don’t need a win events for league championships. Webb Simpson, McIlroy (twice), Henrik Stenson and Justin Thomas all have emerged victorious at TPC Boston since Mickelson. All are short-listers who will have your attention this week, but only McIlroy and Thomas deserve it. Simpson has been on fire but only in the context of this season. Since 2015 at the DTC, he’s gone T44-MC-T75. That positions him similarly to the previously scuffling DeChambeau, but I’d rather ride Simpson on courses like Aronimink and East Lake where his tee-to-green proficiency enhances his chances. Stenson is still nursing a sore left elbow. He’s an easy pass. Same goes for Wyndham champ Brandt Snedeker, who sat out last week with back spasms. And it was warm at Ridgewood. McIlroy is healthy but he’s getting in his own way, so to speak. As a two-time winner and all-time earnings leader of this tournament, we have to expect a renewal of comfort as he reconnects with conviction and confidence. As stated in this space last week, he’s perfect for chasers. Front-runners can empty the chamber. Course history is your ally. Thomas defends with Brooks Koepka, Dustin Johnson, Jordan Spieth, Tony Finau, Adam Scott and Patrick Reed also standing by waiting for the call. Patrick Cantlay, Jon Rahm and Paul Casey are secondary selections for various reasons and all have delivered at TPC Boston at least once before. Do not hesitate regardless of recent form, good or indifferent. When Justin Rose misses a cut at a joint like Ridgewood, you know the course is fair, but his leash is one of the longest. The only issue is that he’s warranted restraint at TPC Boston throughout his career. He’ll regain our attention (and devotion) in earnest at Aronimink where he’s won before. Two-man gamers should focus on surging Billy Horschel and Cameron Smith, the pair at T3 at Ridgewood. A little deeper, the likes of Charley Hoffman and Keegan Bradley should contribute. FUTURE POSSIBILITIES NOTE: Select golfers committed to the tournament are listed alphabetically. Future tournaments are sorted chronologically and reflect previous success on the courses on which the tournaments will be held in 2017-18. The numerical values in parentheses represent the order of relative confidence of where to use each golfer if multiple sites are listed (e.g. 1 for strongest, 2 for next-strongest and so on). To present weighted confidence in real time, numerical values will not change all season no matter how many tournament remain listed for each golfer. All are pending golfer commitment. Paul Casey … Dell Technologies (2); TOUR Championship (3) Kevin Chappell … Dell Technologies (3) Jason Day … Dell Technologies (5) Jason Dufner … TOUR Championship (7) Billy Horschel … TOUR Championship (4) Dustin Johnson … Dell Technologies (11); TOUR Championship (6) Zach Johnson … TOUR Championship (8) Russell Knox … Dell Technologies (7) Rory McIlroy … Dell Technologies (5); TOUR Championship (3) Ryan Moore … TOUR Championship (6) Louis Oosthuizen … Dell Technologies (3) Patrick Reed … Dell Technologies (2) Justin Rose … TOUR Championship (2) Adam Scott … Dell Technologies (9); TOUR Championship (6) Jordan Spieth … TOUR Championship (4) Henrik Stenson … Dell Technologies (9); TOUR Championship (2) Justin Thomas … Dell Technologies (6; defending); TOUR Championship (3) Jimmy Walker … Dell Technologies (7) Bubba Watson … TOUR Championship (4) CHAMPIONS ONE & DONE Shaw Charity Classic Canyon Meadows Golf & Country Club in Calgary, Alberta, hosts the sixth edition of the tournament. It’s a par 70 with five par 3s and three par 5s. Scott McCarron is back to defend a one-stroke victory over Miguel Angel Jiménez. McCarron converted three eagles and 15 birdies against five bogeys en route to 16-under 194. The $2.35-million purse is the largest of the last five tournaments. The winner will pocket $352,500. FUTURE POSSIBILITIES NOTE: Select golfers committed to the tournament are listed alphabetically. Future tournaments are sorted chronologically and reflect previous success on the courses on which the tournaments will be held in 2018. The numerical values in parentheses represent the order of relative confidence of where to use each golfer if multiple sites are listed (e.g. 1 for strongest, 2 for next-strongest and so on). To present weighted confidence in real time, numerical values will not change all season no matter how many tournament remain listed for each golfer. All are pending golfer commitment. Stephen Ames … Shaw (7) Fred Couples … Usable everywhere. Joe Durant … Shaw (11); PURE (3); SAS (13) David Frost … Shaw (8); PURE (1) Doug Garwood … SAS (1) Miguel Angel Jiménez … Shaw (7); SAS (12) Jerry Kelly … Shaw (5); PURE (2); SAS (4) Bernhard Langer … Usable everywhere. Defending five titles. Jeff Maggert … Shaw (5) Billy Mayfair … PURE (1) Scott McCarron … Shaw (5; defending); PURE (8) Colin Montgomerie … Shaw (4); PURE (7); SAS (3; defending) Tom Pernice, Jr. … Shaw (3); SAS (5) Vijay Singh … Shaw (5); SAS (1) Kirk Triplett … Shaw (4) Duffy Waldorf … Shaw (5) WILD CARDS (short list of golfers not included above but on the rise or still building portfolios after recently turning 50): Steve Flesch; Scott Parel; Tim Petrovic; Wes Short, Jr.

Click here to read the full article