Officialsportsbetting.com Golf Betting Sharvin shoots 63 to lead at English Championship

Sharvin shoots 63 to lead at English Championship

Cormac Sharvin of Northern Ireland shot a course-record 8-under 63 Thursday to take a one-shot lead after the first round of the English Championship.

Click here to read the full article

Want to read news about online gambling and the casino industry that is not sports betting specific? Make sure to visit Hypercasinos.com gambling news!

Veritex Bank Championship
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Hank Lebioda+2000
Johnny Keefer+2000
Alistair Docherty+2500
Kensei Hirata+2500
Neal Shipley+2500
Rick Lamb+2500
S H Kim+2500
Trey Winstead+2500
Zecheng Dou+2500
Seungtaek Lee+2800
Click here for more...
The Chevron Championship
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Jeeno Thitikul+900
Nelly Korda+1000
Lydia Ko+1400
A Lim Kim+2000
Jin Young Ko+2000
Angel Yin+2500
Ayaka Furue+2500
Charley Hull+2500
Haeran Ryu+2500
Lauren Coughlin+2500
Click here for more...
Zurich Classic of New Orleans
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy / Shane Lowry+350
Collin Morikawa / Kurt Kitayama+1200
J.T. Poston / Keith Mitchell+1600
Thomas Detry / Robert MacIntyre+1800
Billy Horschel / Tom Hoge+2000
Aaron Rai / Sahith Theegala+2200
Nicolai Hojgaard / Rasmus Hojgaard+2200
Wyndham Clark / Taylor Moore+2200
Nico Echavarria / Max Greyserman+2500
Ben Griffin / Andrew Novak+2800
Click here for more...
Tournament Match-Ups - R. McIlroy / S. Lowry vs C. Morikawa / K. Kitayama
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy / Shane Lowry-230
Collin Morikawa / Kurt Kitayama+175
Tournament Match-Ups - J.T. Poston / K. Mitchell vs T. Detry / R. MacIntyre
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
J.T. Poston / Keith Mitchell-130
Thomas Detry / Robert MacIntyre+100
Tournament Match-Ups - J. Svensson / N. Norgaard vs R. Fox / G. Higgo
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Ryan Fox / Garrick Higgo-125
Jesper Svensson / Niklas Norgaard-105
Tournament Match-Ups - N. Hojgaard / R. Hojgaard vs N. Echavarria / M. Greyserman
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Nicolai Hojgaard / Rasmus Hojgaard-120
Nico Echavarria / Max Greyserman-110
Tournament Match-Ups - M. Fitzpatrick / A. Fitzpatrick vs S. Stevens / M. McGreevy
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Sam Stevens / Max McGreevy-120
Matt Fitzpatrick / Alex Fitzpatrick-110
Tournament Match-Ups - W. Clark / T. Moore vs B. Horschel / T. Hoge
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Billy Horschel / Tom Hoge-130
Wyndham Clark / Taylor Moore+100
Tournament Match-Ups - N. Taylor / A. Hadwin vs B. Garnett / S. Straka
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Nick Taylor / Adam Hadwin-120
Brice Garnett / Sepp Straka-110
Tournament Match-Ups - A. Rai / S. Theegala vs B. Griffin / A. Novak
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Aaron Rai / Sahith Theegala-120
Ben Griffin / Andrew Novak-110
Tournament Match-Ups - J. Highsmith / A. Tosti vs A. Smalley / J. Bramlett
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Joe Highsmith / Alejandro Tosti-130
Alex Smalley / Joseph Bramlett+100
Tournament Match-Ups - A. Bhatia / C. Young vs M. Wallace / T. Olesen
Type: Tournament Match-Ups - Status: OPEN
Akshay Bhatia / Carson Young-120
Matt Wallace / Thorbjorn Olesen-110
Mitsubishi Electric Classic
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Steven Alker+700
Stewart Cink+700
Padraig Harrington+800
Ernie Els+1000
Miguel Angel Jimenez+1200
Alex Cejka+2000
Bernhard Langer+2000
K J Choi+2000
Retief Goosen+2000
Stephen Ames+2000
Click here for more...
Major Specials 2025
Type: To Win A Major 2025 - Status: OPEN
Scottie Scheffler+160
Bryson DeChambeau+350
Xander Schauffele+350
Ludvig Aberg+400
Collin Morikawa+450
Jon Rahm+450
Justin Thomas+550
Brooks Koepka+700
Viktor Hovland+700
Hideki Matsuyama+800
Click here for more...
PGA Championship 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+500
Bryson DeChambeau+1400
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Xander Schauffele+1400
Jon Rahm+1800
Justin Thomas+1800
Collin Morikawa+2000
Brooks Koepka+2500
Viktor Hovland+2500
Click here for more...
US Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+500
Bryson DeChambeau+1200
Xander Schauffele+1200
Jon Rahm+1400
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Collin Morikawa+1600
Brooks Koepka+1800
Justin Thomas+2000
Viktor Hovland+2000
Click here for more...
The Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Rory McIlroy+500
Scottie Scheffler+550
Xander Schauffele+1100
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Collin Morikawa+1600
Jon Rahm+1600
Bryson DeChambeau+2000
Shane Lowry+2500
Tommy Fleetwood+2500
Tyrrell Hatton+2500
Click here for more...
Ryder Cup 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
USA-150
Europe+140
Tie+1200

Related Post

Rahm signs equipment deal with CallawayRahm signs equipment deal with Callaway

Callaway Golf has announced the multi-year signing of Jon Rahm to its tour staff. The second ranked player in the world will play a full bag of Callaway woods, irons, and wedges, along with the brand’s Chrome Soft X golf ball and an Odyssey Putter in 2021. Rahm worked with Callaway to dial in the specs for each of his new clubs and will make his debut as a staff member at this week’s Sentry Tournament of Champions at Kapalua, Maui. As well as an Odyssey putter and Callaway’s Chrome Soft X golf ball, Rahm’s bag in 2021 will include Callaway prototype woods and irons, along with the brand’s Jaws MD5 forged wedges. Rahm said his new clubs have already paid off handsomely as he shot a course record 59 at Silverleaf Club in his adopted hometown of Scottsdale, Arizona. "I'm so happy to be joining Callaway, and I can't wait to start the year," he said. "The equipment is already performing well for me, and in my first round with the new setup, I shot a course record 59 at Silverleaf. I have confidence in my new Callaway clubs - and especially the golf ball, which has really impressed me during the testing process." This is a return to Callaway for Rahm, who used Callaway and Odyssey equipment in his stellar collegiate career at Arizona State University. Playing for head coach Tim Mickelson, he won 11 tournaments as a Sun Devil, which remains the second-most in school history behind fellow Callaway staffer (and Tim’s older brother) Phil Mickelson. "We're proud to welcome Jon Rahm as the newest member of our Tour Staff," said Callaway President & CEO Chip Brewer. "He's one of the very best players in the world, and he's a proven winner on golf's biggest global stages. We've admired Jon for many years, going back to his college days when he first used our equipment. We're excited to see him playing Callaway and Odyssey again as he looks to take his game to yet another level." Rahm, 26, turned professional in 2016 and has already won five times on the PGA TOUR, twice last season. He has reached world No. 1, earned 12 worldwide victories, competed for the victorious 2018 European Ryder Cup team, and won the 2019 European Tour Player of the Year award. Along with his new Callaway clubs, Rahm will wear TravisMathew apparel in 2021.

Click here to read the full article

Can Erin Hills put the bite back in bunkers?Can Erin Hills put the bite back in bunkers?

ERIN, Wis. – Ron Whitten is one of three co-designers of Erin Hills. He’s also the longtime architecture editor at Golf Digest magazine. Thus, he understands what makes a good story, a compelling hook, a headline grabber. So how about this one? Make Bunkers Great Again. OK, so those aren’t exactly the words Whitten is uttering at this week’s U.S. Open. Given the political overtones, he’s probably wise not to even go there (plus, he’d need a red cap). But in essence, that’s his hope for Erin Hills’ lasting legacy once the final putt drops Sunday afternoon. Bunkers in America, he said, have lost their way. They’ve gone soft. Too uniform, similar sand, flat-bottom lies. Rarely do they challenge the world’s best golfers. Once tough and foreboding, bunkers now are often warm and inviting – especially at U.S. Opens, where bunkers can be the preferred play instead of the thick rough that’s usually part of the tournament set-up. “Oh, my god – they’re pillows,â€� Whitten said Wednesday on the eve of the 117th U.S. Open. “Everyone wants the same fluffiness, the same consistency, rolling to a flat spot. “Somebody has to take a stand.â€� Enter Whitten and co-designers Dr. Michard Hurdzan and Dana Fry. When they began constructing Erin Hills more than a decade ago, they set out to make bunkers true hazards, with a significant penalty possible for any balls winding up in the sand. Radical thinking? Perhaps. But bunkers were, of course, originally created to be penal. As Gil Hanse, the architect of the Olympic golf course in Rio and an analysis this week for Fox Sports, said, “For the history of the game, bunkers have been a hazard. If they’re no longer hazardous to play or no longer extract some sort of penalty from a player, then they’re really just taking up space.â€� Yet many of the world’s best players do seem to make bunker shots easy like Sunday morning, and it’s been that way for the last few decades. Consider this: In 1980, the sand save percentage on the PGA TOUR was 42.64 percent. The percentage began to rise fairly rapidly after that, and in 1992, the average eclipsed 50 percent (50.52) for the first time and stayed that way for the next nine years. Just twice in the past 28 years has sand save percentage dipped below 48 percent – in 2005, when it was 47.99, and in 2011, when it was 47.77. Going into this week’s major, the TOUR average is back over 50 percent (at 50.31). “Especially for the best players in the world,â€� Hanse said, “it’s gotten to the point where … really the only difference between being in the bunker and being in the grass is the surface they’re hitting off of.â€� Jason Day, the world’s No. 3-ranked player, concurs. “Unfortunately I think we’ve become accustomed to having certain depth, sand, thickness in bunkers,â€� he said. “… But ultimately in the end, it’s a hazard and that’s what they’re there for – for you not to be in there.â€� The Erin Hills design team hopes their course sends out that message loud and clear this week. Utilizing the contours of the land — rolling terrain reflective of the Kettle Moraine area shaped long ago by converging glaciers – they carved out bunkers void of flat areas, essentially taking the same approach as they did with the undulating fairways. Players hitting out of Erin Hills’ bunkers could face an uphill lie, a downhill lie, a sidehill lie, perhaps a ball resting precariously on a crest or in a valley between mounds of sand. “You have awkward shots within the bunkers, shots you can’t advance forward,â€� Whitten said. “You have to play out sideways. Is that fair? Golf’s not a fair game. You’re not supposed to be in the bunkers.â€� Is he positive that none of Erin Hills’ 138 bunkers have a flat lie? “If there’s one out there,â€� he said, “it’s by mistake.â€� Sand, of course, could be smoothed out to make the lies more even. But Erin Hills has “finely granulated granite,â€� according to Whitten, with small pebbles that help the sand stay in its original formation and hold the contours. Although some have wondered that the pebbles might fall onto the putting surface when a player splashes out, Whitten has a solution – just use a towel to whisk away the pebbles. “They’ve got caddies to clear away loose impediments,â€� he said. “It’s legal.â€� Meanwhile, the designers were determined to include erosion bunkers as a key element of the design. Whitten traveled to the foothills of Kansas and took photographs of the water erosion in the land. He brought the photos back to Wisconsin and basically wanted to match that look. Thus, there are approximately 35 to 40 erosion bunkers, with little nooks and crannies – “fingersâ€� if you will – extending out into the rough. The areas are so small that using a rake is impossible; players or caddies will simply need to smooth out the areas with their feet after shots are taken. Depending on which direction the finger is pointing, a ball finding one of those areas could result in a bunker shot with no chance at the pin. Or perhaps even the green. Consider the par-3 ninth, with erosion bunkers around the green. In a USGA video this week, amateur Brad Dalke tried to maneuver a shot onto the green from one of those lies. He couldn’t. Whitten said he saw Daniel Chopra trying to do the same thing. Hanse estimates that just 10-15 percent of all shots in the bunker at the ninth hole will wind up in a crevice. But perhaps 100 percent of the players will be thinking about it off the tee because of the fingers. “The bunker will have expanded in your mind, the emphasis it has on the hole,â€� he said. Players will learn quickly that it’s useless to try a hero shot from certain spots. Instead, they’ll find it’s best to simply accept the consequences of their errant shot and move on. Or better yet, just avoid the bunkers altogether. “They accept it in Scotland,â€� Whitten said, referencing the deep-faced pot bunkers. “But in the U.S., it’s considered unfair.â€� It’s a noble objective, putting teeth back into bunkers. Making it painful to visit rather than a place of beachy tranquility, in which saving par is better than a 50-50 proposition. Will Erin Hills succeed? Whitten certainly hopes so. But there are no guarantees. “It’ll be interesting to see if our philosophy is rejected or copied,â€� he said. Perhaps he’ll know more once the tournament starts. If players start complaining about the erosion bunkers and the impossible shots they encounter, please forgive him for feeling a sense of satisfaction. Erin Hills will have brought back the bunker.

Click here to read the full article

Tiger Woods talks equipment testingTiger Woods talks equipment testing

A year ago, Tiger Woods signed an endorsement deal with TaylorMade after spending the majority of his professional career using Nike equipment. In the ensuing 12 months, Woods was mostly sidelined due to continued back issues and rehab, but an encouraging performance at last month’s Hero World Challenge has golf fans fired up for his return to the PGA TOUR at this week’s Farmers Insurance Open. PGATOUR.COM Equipment Insider Jonathan Wall recently had an extended one-on-one interview with Woods during a TaylorMade testing session near Woods’ home in Jupiter, Florida. The conversation ranged from his testing process to his evolution in equipment to his club specs to his unique response when asked about golf without a governing body. Testing process On how his testing process changed since 1996 when he turned pro: TIGER WOODS: “When I first turned pro, it was hosel, no adjustable weights. It was just glued hosels and go ahead and hit it. It was a different era, it was a different time, but now TrackMan allows us to cut down on our testing, cut down on our practice sessions, and we’re not beating ourselves into the ground that way. For me, it validated feel, and so when I would feel something and then look at the numbers, it would validate it. Sometimes engineers may not always believe what I’m feeling or what a player is feeling and saying, but then the numbers can definitely validate it.â€�  On his preparation for a club testing: WOODS: “I always test. I’ve never had a problem testing. I’ve always tested, though, when I’m actually hitting well. I don’t want to test when I’m hitting poorly because then I think you can find a club that’s going to Band‑Aid it, and you really don’t know what truly is going to happen when your game turns around.  And so I would push off testings until I worked on my game. Generally I’d do two or three days of practice sessions prior to a testing.â€�  On determining whether to make a club switch:  WOODS: “First of all, it has to be better than what I’m playing, and the only way … is not only to hit it on the range and to see good results, but I’ve got to go out on the golf course and hit shot after shot after shot. Specific shots — bunker here, you have water here, you have wind blowing here, and you’ve got to hit this shot, and just do it day after day after day after day. There’s no magic one day of ‘Oh, this club is in.’ It’s OK, that’s good hitting it that way, [but] let’s try and do something different, different wind conditions, let’s see what happens. “One of the things I think I’ve really done over the years is that I’ve been pretty ardent about playing a product that is better than what I’m using, and all of the companies I’ve been with, they all know that. I will give it my best efforts to try and put it in, but it’s going to take a little time sometimes.â€� On taking the testing process from the range to the course: WOODS: “First things first, it has to look good in the playing position. If it doesn’t look good, I’m already looking at stuff I don’t want to look at, and how am I supposed to hit the most beautiful golf shot with something I don’t like? OK, that’s out. The next one is how does it feel when I waggle it? My hands are the only thing that are touching the golf club, and I’ve been trained to trust my hands, and so as I waggle it — ooh, that feels good, or ooh, that’s a little toe-heavy, or ooh, that weight is way far back. So I get a sense of that, and then hit shots, normally just throw out a couple and then you fire a couple and then you kind of tweak them a little bit.  And then either that day or the next day, I’ll go out and hit some balls on the golf course.â€� On using the waggle as his starting point: WOODS: “I’ve always done that. My dad was a big believer of trusting your hands, let the hands guide you in the golf swing. So that’s what I’ve always done. For as long as I can remember, I’ve always waggled the club and tried to get a feel for it.â€� “Quite frankly it’s easier now to feel it because don’t forget we had these little bitty club heads [early in his career]. The golf ball and the head were like the same size. Well, there’s not a lot of weight distribution that’s left in there. Now they’re [460cc driver heads]. So it’s easier to feel when it’s off a little bit or a little bit different. I’ve always tried to have a baseline, so the baseline is the club that I have in the golf bag because I know they work. Now, I work off of that baseline.” On how much input he gives TrackMan numbers: WOODS: “I’m probably 80/20. Eighty percent feel and hitting shots and 20 percent TrackMan. Yeah, it’s nice to see numbers. I like to do it for swing path a lot of times. I like to see what my path is doing but also when I get up to the longer stuff, I like to see what my spin rate is, and so that’s something where for me that’s what I focus on. I know a lot of guys focus on numbers, how far are they hitting it. I’ve already got my clubs pretty dialed into numbers, how far I’m hitting it. I’ve got a whole golf course in the backyard (laughs). So my wedge game is pretty much dialed in in that way. TrackMan is for hitting specific numbers on wedge shots, which a lot of guys use that for. I have that in my backyard.”  On getting his driver dialed in: WOODS: “It doesn’t need to be bang‑on because I’m not going to hit every shot perfect. But once it’s in the ballpark — what I like is I will actually try and mis‑hit a couple shots and see what it does, what my tendencies are, especially under the gun. I like to hit these little low bleeding fades out there, and my miss has always been off the heel, so what does it look like when I hit it off the heel a little bit?â€� On matching up new clubs with a new ball: WOODS: “The golf ball was the first and foremost. That’s where I started from. I started from the green back. … Most of the golf balls are very hard. I like to have a softer golf ball, a little bit more spin. Once I found that, that part of it was nice. Now, as far as working my way through the bag, I had a hard time with that because at the time I was still hurt, and so my testing was very limited in that regard, which was frustrating. My irons didn’t change, so the only thing that changed were my woods, and my speed had come down dramatically, and so we were looking at more loft, a little more help in the shaft at the bottom, a little more kick, all these things I found very frustrating, but it was very real at the same time.â€� On the importance of sound and feel with irons: WOODS: “Oh, the feel, absolutely. It’s got to perform through the turf. That’s the feedback. That’s what goes into my hands and the forearms and I get a good sense of what’s going on. I’ve always been a person that couldn’t stand some of the new technology in irons because if I hit one flush, it should go on the absolute number, that’s it. Can’t go any further. Sometimes you may catch a jumper now with these new irons, a little bit hotter faces, they’ll jump if you hit it flush. For me, the worst thing I could possibly happen is if I mis‑hit it [and] then it goes the proper distance. I’m like, Uh‑oh, did I hit that bad? I want it to go short because where’s all the trouble. You can’t get up‑and‑down from long. You can always get up‑and‑down from short. So I’d much rather hit a bad shot and be, whatever, come up five yards short generally. That’s OK. I don’t want to have any surprises long.â€�  Club thoughts On his initial thoughts of TaylorMade’s M3 and M4 lines: WOODS: “When they first introduced the Twist Face and what that looks like, obviously the beginning model, it was like this is crazy. It looks like a [Ruffles] potato chip, you know? It looked awful. But in the playing position, you don’t even see it, it’s so subtle. Obviously, the mockup that they gave me is just to exemplify what they’re actually doing. But in the playing position, you don’t even notice it. I would try and hit a couple shots off the heel because that’s where I always miss it. I miss everything on the heel, and I grew up in an era where it was Balata balls and persimmon. I was probably the last kind of generation that probably grew up with that. So I was always taught to hit the ball on the heel as your miss, stay in the air and hit a cut and get it in play. Total quick hook with persimmon was awful.  Because of that, I’ve always missed it on the heel. “I like the Twist Face because I’m hitting that spot, that shot with a little bit more oomph to it. It doesn’t quite bleed out like it used to do. So that to me is already promising, but I’ve still got to do a lot of testing on the range and then obviously bring it to the golf course and put a lot of work in on it.â€� On providing design feedback such as on TaylorMade’s prototype 6-iron: WOODS: “I am very simple when it comes to my blades. I like them a certain length. I’ve played blades basically since I was 16 years old, and so I’ve traditionally liked a longer-size blade. Not the Hogan PCs or Apex, which are basically the little bitty ones. Mine are a little bit longer. You know, I remember playing old Daiwa Advisors that Ian Baker‑Finch used to play, David Graham played, and so I liked that little longer head. And I like the top line a little bit on the thinner side. But as I told these guys, I said, hey, you can put a dancing monkey on the back of a club, I don’t care. I don’t care what it’s stamped like. Just so it looks good in playing the position, which I like. This one looked great, and it’s in the window that I’m looking for.â€� On his transition to adjustable hosels: WOODS: “I found it frustrating at the beginning, but also I’ve found it pretty awesome in the sense that because I was hurt at the time trying to do all these testings, I couldn’t afford to hit a bunch of different clubs, and so I decided to tweak with this head, the shaft, this weight on more heel bias, more toe bias, just trying to figure it all out. It became a lot easier on my body, so that part was nice. And then because of that, I gravitated towards that, and that made me think that, you know what, hey, I’ve got to learn all this stuff. There’s like over a thousand different settings. OK, so I’ve got to go to school, so teach me what is all this stuff, and teach me the physics, teach me the geometry. Once I started to understand what was going on, I could assert myself more in a conversation about what I needed from a club, and I think that really helped me be able to put together my set, and one of the reasons why I drove it so well [at the Hero World Challenge], why I hit the 3‑wood so well and why the 2‑iron is really working because I finally understood it.â€�  On his club specs: WOODS: “I’m stock spec from say the 60s. The only thing that would be weird is I have a 60‑degree sand wedge. I didn’t have a 60 until probably late high school, just 56 and open and whatever you want to do. I had a 1‑iron and a 2‑iron. But yeah, my pitching wedge is 50 degrees, my 9‑iron is 45 and a half. I see some of these guys with pitching wedges that are 45 or 44. This whole four‑wedge system I don’t understand; just why don’t you take something off? I just don’t understand that part. In the Bahamas I had 89 yards out and 95 yards out and pulled out pitching wedge. To me that’s what I’ve been able to do. Let’s also don’t forget I play a softer, spinnier ball, so those little shots are easier for me to hit.â€� On shaft-length and spec changes from Nike to TaylorMade: WOODS: “I went from 45 [inches], sometimes 44-3/4ths down to 44-1/2. I picked up more distance when I went down to that length. Because I’m still accustomed to playing a 43-1/2 for so many years, and when I went to 45, I’d just lose it in space. When I went down to 44-1/2, I felt great. 44-1/4, I feel it even better, but the problem is I lose too much distance in it. I don’t have enough oomph, so I settled on 44-1/2. “3‑wood is the same, stock. My loft of my 3‑wood is 15 degrees. I’ve generally played 14 and a half to 15 degrees in my 3‑wood since I was 20. All of my irons are — all my irons since I was 16 years old have been the same loft. Now, they’ve been different lies based on my coaches that I was using at the time, they’d go upright to flat or wherever they may be, but the lofts are all the same.â€�  On his grind preference with his wedges: WOODS: “My bounce generally has been towards the leading edge. I have a relief right next to the leading edge so I’m able to hit it on hard‑packed ground, able to get the leading edge down. But I also have enough relief on the back so I can slide it underneath on the heel side. But you know, traditionally my soles have been pretty much standard in width, a little more rounded than some guys, just because I like to use different parts of the bounce, depending on what shot I’m going to use. But it really hasn’t changed that much in like 15 years or so. It’s been pretty much the same.â€� Team TaylorMade On whether he considered become a free agent after Nike exited the equipment industry: WOODS: “I was going the free agent route. I did, and then looked at my house — it was a warehouse. A lot of manufacturers were sending me stuff. Tell me how this looks, tell me how that looks. Let me narrow it down here. And then I didn’t have to go anywhere, I could just test right here on my simulator, so I tested on my simulator, tried to see what it would feel like. Ooh, that felt not so good. That felt pretty good. TaylorMade’s were feeling consistently good across the board. So I thought, I’ve got to take this stuff outside and see what it does. And I did it, and I was just blown away how stable the club was and how far I was able to hit it.â€� On why he was drawn to TaylorMade: WOODS: “Don’t forget — I played TaylorMade in my amateur days and a little bit in my collegiate stuff, and on top of that, one of my best friends was Mark O’Meara. He was with TaylorMade forever. So I was always privy to all this new stuff from the Burner Plus to the Bubble shaft that came out, and he won two major championships that year in ’98. So I’ve been privy to a lot of the tech that was coming out with TaylorMade just because of being around with Mark. I knew the quality, but then again, I’ve won with Nike, I’ve put all my efforts into that business. It didn’t turn out, but now I’m here to be able to put all my efforts into TaylorMade.â€� On the importance of working with club builder Mike Taylor, who was also part of Tiger’s team at Nike: WOODS: “Mikey T is the best. He trained with [Ben] Hogan. He’d been through it. And he’s got such a unique ability to grind and have me tell him what I want and have him create it. Just our communication is just fantastic. “What I just said, it has to perform through the dirt. With his southern accent, man, he’s talking about, ‘Man, perform through the dirt.’ So him talking like that and his gyrations that he gets into — but he’s a master craftsman. He really is. He’s got a great feel and a great eye. Our rapport has been fantastic, but also I have a lot of trust in Mike. He’s been able to produce what I want, and since he’s been on board, I’ve had some pretty darned good years.â€� On getting feedback from other TaylorMade staff players: WOODS: “I do a lot with the TaylorMade guys now, whether it’s Rory [McIlroy], Jason [Day] or [Dustin Johnson], [Justin Rose]. It’s just because I’m so far behind the curve; I haven’t been with TaylorMade that long. And then while I’ve been with TaylorMade I’ve been hurt. And so I’m kind of out to date on a lot of information that they’ve been prevalent to, and also what they’ve been feeling in tournaments. Normally I can see what they’re doing in the tournaments, I can see the shots they hit and all that stuff. That gives me an idea of what’s going on. I haven’t just been watching TV. ‘It’s nice to talk with those guys, and especially why they put this in play, and like DJ, he’s got a 4 wood in there. I said, ‘How far do you hit that club? it’s like 17 degrees.’ He’s like, ‘Well, I hit it about 280, 285.’ He said, ‘Yeah, if I go down to 15 it goes too far, like 290, 300.’ I’m like, ‘Dude, stop. Enough. Enough. I’m not asking you anymore.’ (laughs)â€� On working with TaylorMade Tour rep Keith Sbarbaro: WOODS: “We haven’t worked together that many times. As I said, unfortunately, my health was a big deterrent in a lot of that stuff. But I’ve been on TOUR when I was playing, and he was working with DJ or playing practice rounds with him. Even caddied for DJ a couple times. Also he worked with Jason [Day], and Jason I pick his brains all the time on clubs and shots and all that stuff. And so I’ve known Keith for quite some time, and I’ve seen what he’s done for guys, and he’s incredible. He’s very talented, very good at what he does, and he’s honest. He’s not going to blow smoke up your butt. He’s very straightforward. He’s going to say, that club is not good for you, that club’s good for you. Or you didn’t hit that right. Yeah, I did. No, you didn’t, that kind of thing. He’s straightforward, and that’s what you want out of a person in your camp. You want someone to tell you just like it is, whether or not you agree.â€� Equipment rules On how equipment would be different without a governing body: WOODS: “Well, no governing body, I think that you would have to carry 14 drivers. What I mean by that is have somebody in the stands or gallery, whatever, come along with you, like a Keith [Sbarbaro], because you can have it as thin as possible, you can tee it as high as you possibly can, and you’re going to hit this thing, crack the face, but it’s going to knuckle and fly forever. Yeah, that’s what I would foresee that every player would be doing. Why not, if you can, because you can replace a club if you break it. In the motion of playing, not in anger but hitting off the tee. But yeah, hit it off the face and let’s go.â€� On his stance about the golf ball: WOODS: “I am of the opinion that we should bifurcate. The line of demarcation, in my opinion, should be professional and amateur. That’s it. If you play in a pro member, the pro has got to play this other ball, the pro ball. If you’re an amateur, you can play the most juiced up golf ball, just go hit and go find it. I think that amateur golf, we can actually push the limits with everything if not get rid of the limits, right. Let them go have fun. Let them enjoy it. Let them — we’re trying to bring more people into the game of golf. Let them go ahead and enjoy hitting it further and straighter. “But professional ranks, it’s like a different deal. It’s like going from aluminum in little league and college to when you turn pro and go into A, AA and AAA and obviously the bigs, it’s all wood. That’s just the way it is. The rules are bifurcated for them. There’s no reason why we can’t do it for us. Now, then that goes back to do you standardize the golf ball at the pro level, and this is where it’s kind of tricky because each manufacturer is going to say, no, you can’t, because they want to produce their own golf ball. But you can probably change dimple patterns to make them a little bit deeper, a little bit smaller. You can soften up the cover, obviously soften of the core, make it slower, and you can bring the ball back.â€�

Click here to read the full article