Officialsportsbetting.com Golf Betting Titleist’s new CNCPT CP-01 and CP-02 irons: ‘Leashes off’ and a huge price tag

Titleist’s new CNCPT CP-01 and CP-02 irons: ‘Leashes off’ and a huge price tag

Titleist’s new high-end CNCPT CP-01 and CNCPT CP-02 irons were born without limits. When building the CNCPT irons, Titleist’s Research and Development team was allowed to use any materials and processes, with no regards for a budget. “CNCPT is the result of our R&D team having the leashes taken off,â€� Kelley Moser Jr., Titleist’s Brand Manager of CNCPT Clubs told PGATOUR.COM. “ ‘Hey, you guys go find whatever you can find that’s really cool — new materials, new processes, whatever it takes — to give our customers a product worth the price tag that they’ll be paying for.’ â€� In recent years, it seems the floodgates have opened for high-priced irons on the domestic retail market. It’s no longer uncommon for a single iron to sell for more than $400. Titleist, however, says some of its competitors had a product that didn’t match the price points. “We sat back and watched some of what our competitors have done with the price point, and the product themselves [were] not what we thought was worth that price point,â€� Moser said. “But they sold a lot of it. So we said ‘Alright, if we could go ahead and build anything we wanted, what would we do?’â€� Titleist’s new CNCPT irons are the result of that no-holds-barred process. Most notably, the hollow bodied irons use a face insert – Titleist is calling it a “Super Metal L-Face insertâ€� — that’s made from a mysterious, high-strength material that’s “never been used before in golf,â€� according to Moser. “It’s the highest strength material that we’ve ever tested,â€� Moser said. “It allows us to make the thinnest unsupported face in golf. I can’t say what the name of the material is at this point; we don’t have exclusive rights to it. It’s very expensive, very rare, and you have to buy a lot of it at one point in time so it’s an expensive endeavor, but it’s worth it when you watch the ball flight.â€� The thin inserts, unlike most face inserts throughout the industry, have uniform thickness from heel-to-toe and top-to-bottom, rather than a variable thickness. As Moser explains, this helps to reduce hot spots, or in other words, areas of the face that produce higher ball speeds than others. In general, having a very thin, high-strength face helps to raise ball speeds, but it also reduces unwanted weight from the face area to be utilized in other, more effective areas. Titleist used this discretionary weight to add Tungsten – a high-density material — to the clubs’ perimeters. In fact, Titleist reports that Tungsten makes up “nearly 50 percentâ€� of the total head weights in the lower lofted irons. This design means more forgiveness for golfers because the perimeter-weighted head leads to higher MOI (moment of inertia, a measure of energy transfer), and with the positioning of Tungsten low-and-rearward, the irons are designed for higher launch, as well. The CNCPT irons come in two different head models: the CP-01 and the CP-02. The CP-02 head shape is for players who enjoy the look and sound of a traditional blade, but with higher performance than the traditionally unforgiving blade constructions. “This would be a product for guys who maybe used to play blades – we’ve all played blades at one point or another,â€� Moser explains. “But since the advent of cavity back, high-MOI, all the Tungsten you use now, you sacrifice a lot by using traditional blade. Most people know, ‘I want to use a blade but I know I shouldn’t.’ So they’ve graduated and moved onto maybe AP2 or AP3 or something along those lines. But they still would really like to have a blade in their bag. So we can do that. With all the Tungsten and how dense the tungsten is, we can cram a lot of weight in the perimeter of this golf club, and still use that super thin metal face to get the speed that they want. So what you have here is an MB look, with AP2 workability, but an AP3 speed. So it’s a homerun for us. We’ve had a lot of fun showing consumers this product because it’s so vastly different from anything we’ve ever made in the past.â€� The CP-01, on the other hand, is more of a performance-first design with a slightly larger profile, more offset and a thicker topline; it’s made for maximum performance. “The performance of [the CP-01] is unparalleled,â€� Moser said. “There’s nothing in the market that’s going to come off the face faster with the ball flight characteristics that you want to see, than this.â€� Both of the head models are made with hollow-bodied constructions. There have been other high-end irons on the market from various companies that use material between the face and the body for durability, or sound/feel benefits, but Titleist decided to keep the irons hollow. “When you put something to support a thin face, you’re essentially taking away the benefit of a thin face,â€� Moser said. “So we wanted to make sure as thin as we can go, we wanted to keep it unsupported from the inside. That was a big component for us.â€� As for the price tag, Titleist will sell the CNCPT CP-01 and CP-02 irons for $500 per head. Moser explains the price point: “We’re going to sell them for $500 per club, which, in our opinion there’s a market there at that price point. But we didn’t want it to be a marketing story. We wanted it to be about product and performance first. So you’re not going to hear us talking about it a lot. We’re not going to be on TV. We’re not going to be in your face marketing in a traditional sense. This is going to be more word-of-mouth, underground. We’re going to find the right people first. We’re going to fit them, we’re going to get them excited about the equipment, and we’re going to let them tell their friends and we’re going to let it grow organically that way, because we want all the money to go into the product and the research to develop products like this, rather than talking about the products.” Titleist has a special concierge to setup fitting for the CNCPT irons.

Click here to read the full article

Do you like other ways of online slots and want to learn about their volatility? WHAT IS SLOT VOLATILITY AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? will answer all your questions!

KLM Open
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Joakim Lagergren+375
Ricardo Gouveia+650
Connor Syme+850
Francesco Laporta+1200
Andy Sullivan+1400
Richie Ramsay+1400
Oliver Lindell+1600
Jorge Campillo+2500
Jayden Schaper+2800
David Ravetto+3500
Click here for more...
Major Specials 2025
Type: To Win A Major 2025 - Status: OPEN
Bryson DeChambeau+500
Jon Rahm+750
Collin Morikawa+900
Xander Schauffele+900
Ludvig Aberg+1000
Justin Thomas+1100
Joaquin Niemann+1400
Shane Lowry+1600
Tommy Fleetwood+1800
Tyrrell Hatton+1800
Click here for more...
US Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Scottie Scheffler+275
Rory McIlroy+650
Bryson DeChambeau+700
Jon Rahm+1200
Xander Schauffele+2000
Ludvig Aberg+2200
Collin Morikawa+2500
Justin Thomas+3000
Joaquin Niemann+3500
Shane Lowry+3500
Click here for more...
The Open 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
Scottie Scheffler+400
Rory McIlroy+500
Xander Schauffele+1200
Ludvig Aberg+1400
Collin Morikawa+1600
Jon Rahm+1600
Bryson DeChambeau+2000
Shane Lowry+2500
Tommy Fleetwood+2500
Tyrrell Hatton+2500
Click here for more...
Ryder Cup 2025
Type: Winner - Status: OPEN
USA-150
Europe+140
Tie+1200

Related Post

Matt Jones clears anchoring concern to make great par at Sony OpenMatt Jones clears anchoring concern to make great par at Sony Open

HONOLULU – Australian Matt Jones was getting attention last week after a record breaking 23 under weekend in Maui, but even a favorable ruling and resulting great par save in Honolulu wasn’t enough to get the two-time PGA TOUR winner to the weekend. Jones hit his approach shot on the par-4 8th hole at Waialae Country Club just above the lip of a greenside bunker in Friday’s second round of the Sony Open, forcing him into a strange stance with one foot in and one foot out of the sand. Scrambling to try to make the cut Jones faced a stance where his body dropped well below its usual position meaning the only way he could make a stroke was by gripping halfway down his 3-wood and creating a putting like motion. However, this meant the end of the club was running up Jones’ left arm, leaving the 2021 Honda Classic winner worried he might be accused of anchoring. “I had a stance that was very unconventional and I had to grip a long way down the shaft. I just wanted to check it wasn’t classified as anchoring because as we know anchoring is somewhat banned,” Jones explained after rounds of 70-68. Jones called in Senior Tournament Referee Stephen Cox for clarification and was given the all-clear by the veteran official. “It was very easy for Coxy to see I wasn’t trying to subvert any rules,” Jones added. “I was trying to play it kind of across my body. It was more running up my arm and in between arm and body but during the stroke it kind of got over to my left side so I just wanted to be sure before I did anything.” Cox spent a minute or so with Jones running through the scenario which coincidentally had happened over on the first green with Lucas Glover and another official earlier in the round and as such had been a point of discussion amongst the committee. “The awkward nature of Matt’s stance resulted in him gripping the club down the shaft and as a result the club was going to extend beyond the forearm and might touch the upper arm or the side of the body while making the stroke,” Cox added. “I felt that as he was not deliberately holding the club against a part of the body above the forearm it would not be considered anchoring. Any accidental contact during the stroke is not prohibited by the Rule.” Rule 10.1b. outlaws players using an anchor point for a stroke or from making deliberate contact with their clothing during a stroke. However inadvertent contact is specifically not a breach to ensure circumstances just like those Jones and Glover faced are not penalized. The Australian also mentioned some minor exposure of bunker lining in his discussion with Cox but it was of no consequence. “Matt also had questions relating the to the bunker liner which was not considered abnormal,” Cox confirmed. “As per PGA TOUR Local Rules, exposed bunker liners may be treated as ground under repair for lie of ball or area of intended swing but no relief is provided for stance.”

Click here to read the full article

Patrick Cantlay, Xander Schauffele maintain one-shot lead at Zurich ClassicPatrick Cantlay, Xander Schauffele maintain one-shot lead at Zurich Classic

AVONDALE, La — Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele shot a 4-under 68 in alternate-shot play Friday at windswept TPC of Louisiana to maintain a one-stroke lead in the Zurich Classic of New Orleans. RELATED: Leaderboard | Inside the Field: Mexico Open at Vidanta The Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup partners opened with a tournament-record 59 on Thursday in best-ball play. They were at 17 under. The teams of David Lipsky-Aaron Rai and Doc Redman-Sam Ryder were second after 67s. Cameron Tringale-Wyndham Clark and Brandon Grace-Garrick Higgo were 15 under. Higgo and Grace shot 64, and Tringale and Clark had a 67. Masters champion Scottie Scheffler and Ryan Palmer settled for an even-par 72 to make the cut on the number at 8 under. The father-son team of Jay Haas and Bill Haas also made the cut on the number, following a 65 with a 71. At 68 years, four months, Jay Haas is the oldest player to make a PGA TOUR cut. The format shifts back to the best-ball Saturday. The final round will be alternate shot.

Click here to read the full article

WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play: Day 2 match recapsWGC-Dell Technologies Match Play: Day 2 match recaps

AUSTIN, Texas — It’s Moving Day, er, Day 2 at the World Golf Championships-Dell Technologies Match Play. We’ll post recaps as each of the 32 Group Stage matches are completed Thursday at Austin Country Club, so check back often throughout the day. MATCH PLAY: Scores | Group Standings | Bracket Group 7 FRANCESCO MOLINARI (7) def. THORBJORN OLESEN (45), 4 and 3 Molinari drove the green at the 335-yard par-4 fifth, then holed a 33-foot eagle putt that highlighted a terrific front nine. He was 4-up after seven holes and never opened the door for Olesen to rally. Holes won: Molinari 7, Olesen 3. Holes led: Molinari 13, Olesen 0. Group 10 PAUL CASEY (10) and CHARLES HOWELL III (42), halved Casey controlled the match with a bogey-free stretch from holes 3-17 but three-putted from 48 feet on the 18th hole as Howell escaped with a half-point. Howell was 2-down through 16 but started his rally with a birdie on the par-5 16th. Holes won: Casey 2, Howell 2. Holes led: Casey 13, Howell 0. ABRAHAM ANCER (58) def. CAMERON SMITH (25), 3 and 2 Ancer stumbled out of the gate with four bogeys in his first five holes, but a 15-foot eagle putt at the par-5 sixth flipped the switch. He was a bogey-free 5 under on his last 11 holes and matched every birdie that Smith could produce. Holes won: Ancer 5, Smith 2. Holes led: Ancer 7, Smith 6 Group standings: Casey 1.5, Howell 1.5, Ancer 1.0, Smith 0.0

Click here to read the full article